Showing posts with label alberto gonzales mathew friedrich conyers karl rove iglesias bogus crimes destroyed e-mail gwb43.com attorney general leahy cheney bush barnett domenici specter waxman hearings may 10 2007. Show all posts
Showing posts with label alberto gonzales mathew friedrich conyers karl rove iglesias bogus crimes destroyed e-mail gwb43.com attorney general leahy cheney bush barnett domenici specter waxman hearings may 10 2007. Show all posts

Thursday, May 10, 2007

DoJ criminal attorney matthew w. friedrich's sworn statement directly implicates karl rove in david iglesias' firing!


or, fun with evidentiary transcripts. . .


as the house judiciary committee hearing
wound-down this afternoon, chairman john
conyer's office released a three-page, re-
dacted transcript of criminal division
department of justice attorney matthew w.
friedrich's
sworn statements. . . they were
mentioned by the chairman, to mr. gonzales,
rather pointedly this morning (video coming
very soon on that), and i think, these are the
first under-oath, written bits-o'-evidence from
any attorney -- inside the gonzales depart-
ment of justice, mind you -- which directly
assert that karl rove was behind the firing
of david iglesias in new mexico. iglesias
was fired, in large part, for being slow to
bring a politically-expedient, but largely
meritless, "voter fraud" case to
ding a democratic candidate, very near
the november 2006 mid-term elections. . .
thus provoking the ire of sen. pete
domenici, and allegedly,
now -- one mister karl rove.

this direct connection between iglesias'
resistance to bringing a bogus case, and
karl rove's desire to fire him on that
basis
, is what's "new". note, friedrich,
a DoJ attorney, is now saying this is true,
under penalty of perjury, and disbarment. . .

let's take a look (page one, above),
at page two, now, shall we?
[as ever, click each image to enlarge.
@ 11:18 p.m. -- mcclatchy's is now carrying its take
on these tid-bits, over its wire-service
, btw.]



note that the answer to the monica goodling
question (immediately above) is "no", below:



so -- we know that rep. conyers has karl
rove square in his sights -- and we know
chairman conyers is holding, but has not
yet issued, a subpoena with mr. rove's
name
on it, for his personal appearance. . .

it would seem like it is that
time
, again, mr. chairman. . .

it is turd-blossom subpoena-in' time!

oh, yeah. . .!

UPDATED 5.12.07 -- here is the video: