U P D A T E D:
12.03.07 @ 7:15 p.m.
emptywheel, over at her snazzy
new digs -- replete with stone
crushing wheel masthead(!) -- makes
an excellent point, in her reference
to mine on this topic. she notes that
most of the next page, after the one
i imaged, in purple, below, is blank.
redacted. almost a whole page.
what the eff is that about?
everyone involved (we were told,
anyway) already resigned. . .
so, what's the deal with the
redaction of the march 6, 2007
watch EW's space -- she'll
surely let us know -- and her
guesses will be better than most
folks' facts. . .
p e a c e
original post: 12.02.07 @ 9:05 p.m.
while much of what appears
in this latest document dump from
the department of justice simply
confirms the "keystone cops caper"
of a cover-up job re the real reasons
these u.s. attorneys were cut loose,
i do not remember ever seeing dana
perino -- white house spokesperson,
she -- so clearly agitated in any
of the earlier doument dump emails. . .
that, i think, is new.
and -- i think -- i read every page
of every one, over the last seven months. . .
so -- while the full three sets
are under this link at the house
judiciary committee -- here we see
dana perino plainly opining that
even she knew it would be inapprop-
riate for pete domenici to contact
u.s. attorney iglesias about any
ongoing investigation. . .
that was in early-march of 2007.
and yet, we were insulted by months
of denials, half-truths and outright lies
about the real reasons these professional were fired.
to coin [more precisely,
quote] a phrase: "bad. -- very bad. . .":
[just click the image to enlarge it.]