team libby's june 25, 2007 final reply to fitzs' opposition to motion. . .

updated:

do see installment two -- on libby's final
reply -- i just posted it.

the full robbins russell firm pdf is here.

developing. . . but note that this is
just about all lawrence robbins could
muster in response to the c.i.p.a. § 6(c)
v. § 6(e) discussion. so -- we may safely
assume he cannot cite any actual case
authority for the proposition that
§§ 6(a) or (c) cases should be treated as
§ 6(e) cases. . . game. set. match.

click to enlarge.



more soon. . .