I frankly never thought I'd see this day -- since he declined to endorse the Democratic nominees, in either 2016, or 2020.
But I gather he's finally seen enough (through three national election cycles!) of... Tangerine's endless crime spree. Like his daughter, he cannot "stand back, and stand by" any longer.
Well. . . its about damn time, man.
But credit -- where credit is due.
Out.
It centrally involves Trump's lawyer, Evan Corcoran -- and it is a rather convoluted federal statutory construction tale, to be sure.
But Dick Cheney sought, post 2003 (and Valerie Plame's outing), to make it harder for the executive offices to get into dutch for going after political opponents with what might be classified government information. But in the process, he made the penalties worse, for executives who willingly refuse to return classified materials, while more widely freeing up their use, if properly declassified, even by the same executive.
Do go read all of EW, as it is a rollicking good tale -- but here's the punchline (Dark Brandon wins this round!):
...But there’s good reason to believe that Corcoran’s arguments about Trump — for the little they’re worth — would apply equally to Biden as to Trump, thanks, in part, to Dick Cheney.
How about them apples, huh?....
For almost two decades, on and off, I argued with Hinderaker and the boys -- about Cheney's fecklessnes.
They uniformly, always, took his side. I still think he was an awful, self-obsessed, vain, old man -- even before the end of 43's time.
But he is right -- tonight -- about this much:
...“In our nation’s 246-year history, there has never been an individual who is a greater threat to our republic than Donald Trump,” Cheney said. “He tried to steal the last election using lies and violence to keep himself in power after the voters had rejected him. He is a coward. A real man wouldn’t lie to his supporters. He lost his election, and he lost big. I know it. He knows it, and deep down, I think most Republicans know.”
Her father’s ad dropped less than two weeks before Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) is set to face a tough challenge from a Trump-backed candidate, attorney Harriet Hageman, in her Aug. 16 primary. Cheney has raised millions as her national profile balloons, but it might not be enough to take on Trump and his advisers, who have poured money and energy into her takedown....
...We’re now well past viable cable serial drama plot cred, with:
– The Door Man Cometh
– Yet Another Funny Hat Hits the Screens on Cable TV News
– Porn Star To Win ($omething) Via Mob Consigliere’s Own Goal
– Mob Consigliere Recorded Everything, and Everything’s Been Seized...
– Total BS-Spouting POTUS Declines To Talk To Attorney in Own Admin
– PlameGate Cross-Streams With Don John’s Crime Wave
– Two Consecutive FBI Directors (Each A Candidate for Most Boring Straight-Laced White Dude Federal Civil Servant Of The 21st Century) To Publish NY Times Best Selling Books Within One Month
– Same B.S. POTUS & Allies Crank Right Wing Noise Machine Up To Eleven and Train Same on Said Two Boring Former FBIDs Plus Current Boring White Dude Assistant AG...
...yet no one – not Garry Kasparov nor any other chessmaster, nor any attorney pundit in or out of a funny hat – can possibly foresee the endgame....
The truth is seems -- is often... far stranger. And disgusting....
Erik Prince -- whose sister is now Secretary of Education, under 45 -- apparently (allegedly) held Logan Act violating meetings, on behalf of then only citizen Trump. To open a back channel to... Putin. What a pig -- per The Washington Post tonihgt:
...The United Arab Emirates arranged the meeting — nine days before Donald Trump's inauguration — between Blackwater founder Erik Prince and a Russian close to President Vladimir Putin as part of an apparent effort to establish a back-channel line of communication between Moscow and the president-elect, according to U.S., European and Arab officials. The White House said it was not aware of any meetings and Prince had no role in Trump's transition....
Nice. Onward. And take that, Mr. Cheney -- history is obliterating almost all of your wrong headed follies from the rule of law, here in our truer, bluer version of 21st Century America.. . .In a remarkable reversal of national security policy formed after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the Senate voted on Tuesday to curtail the federal government’s sweeping surveillance of American phone records, sending the legislation to President Obama’s desk for his signature. . . .
Here was the October 2014 verdict(s) -- yesterday was the sentencing. Deeply delayed, but plainly the right outcome.
The New York Times has it all:
. . .One by one, four former Blackwater security contractors wearing blue jumpsuits and leg irons stood before a federal judge on Monday and spoke publicly for the first time since a deadly 2007 shooting in Iraq. . . .
In Iraq (pre 2006), Blackwater was perceived as so powerful that its employees could kill anyone and get away with it, said Mohammed Hafedh Abdulrazzaq Kinani, whose 9-year-old son, Ali, was killed in Nisour Square. . . .
I too find this idea repugnant -- which is why the logic is. . . in fact. . . compelling.
Establish that crimes were committed by Cheney, by pardoning him. Perfect. Here's the Gray Lady's reprint of Mr. Romero's fine opinion -- do go read it all:
. . .Mr. Obama could pardon George J. Tenet for authorizing torture at the C.I.A.’s black sites overseas, Donald H. Rumsfeld for authorizing the use of torture at the Guantánamo Bay prison, David S. Addington, John C. Yoo and Jay S. Bybee for crafting the legal cover for torture, and George W. Bush and Dick Cheney for overseeing it all.
While the idea of a pre-emptive pardon may seem novel, there is precedent. Presidents Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Johnson pardoned Confederate soldiers as a step toward unity and reconstruction after the Civil War. Gerald R. Ford pardoned Richard M. Nixon for the crimes of Watergate. Jimmy Carter pardoned Vietnam War draft resisters.
The spectacle of the president’s granting pardons to torturers still makes my stomach turn. But doing so may be the only way to ensure that the American government never tortures again. Pardons would make clear that crimes were committed; that the individuals who authorized and committed torture were indeed criminals; and that future architects and perpetrators of torture should beware. Prosecutions would be preferable, but pardons may be the only viable and lasting way to close the Pandora’s box of torture once and for all. . . .
UPDATED: 12.23.2020 -- The Tangerine Mussolini has pardoned all of them. I am disgusted, but not surprised. Criminals... gotta' criminal....
Finally. Some form of rough justice -- via the NYT today:
. . .Jurors found one defendant guilty of murder and three others of manslaughter and weapons charges, roundly asserting that the shooting was criminal. . . .Backgrounder here. Namaste -- one and all.
Seventeen Iraqis died when gunfire erupted on Sept. 16, 2007 in the crowded Nisour Square in Baghdad. The shooting inflamed anti-American sentiment abroad and helped solidify the notion that Blackwater, America’s largest security contractor in Iraq, was reckless and unaccountable.
The former contractors said that they were ambushed by insurgents and that civilian deaths were the unfortunate, unintended consequences of urban warfare.
The defendants were Blackwater guards. One of them, Nicholas A. Slatten, who the government said fired the first shots, was convicted of murder. The others — Dustin L. Heard, Evan S. Liberty and Paul A. Slough — were convicted on manslaughter and firearms charges. . . .
Ric Olson
Last night, I wrote that you are right -- my list assumes away argument. Just as the original post's author does. I employed a tactic of dishonest rhetoric -- just as the author of this post did. I returned the favor. Thanks for making that plain. You are a useful foil.
The original author says our 44th President has acheived nothing. I disagree.
Let's leave it at that. But do be certain, only Mr. Obama had both the authoirty -- and the courage -- to pull the trigger on the daring SEAL Team 6 operation. The end of OBL belongs on his list of "Mission Accomplished!" (contra the goofy Bush photo op on the air carrier deck, re the Iraq War). Mr. Obama himself would say he didn't do it alone, at all. He had the help of intelligence, courageous special ops personnel, and ten years of tracking by all our allied agencies around the world.
He would say -- "I didn't build that" -- not alone. It took all of us. ALL of US.
US -- as in the US of America. Mr. Romney and the Republicans are so eager to tear him down that they now take his "it takes a village" explanation for businesses (businesses do need police protection, and roads and brisges and good teachers for skilled workforces) and claim it is anti-American. That, my friends is sad -- and dishonest.
As is the original author of this post.
So, almost a decade later, we are finally getting the wisps of confirmation that independent branches of our federal government were "scathingly critical" of the Bush-Cheney (but mostly Cheney) CIA led interrogation techniques.
Probably the single greatest piece of wisdom from it all is this: The. Torture. Yielded. Almost. No. Reliable. Information. Chambers v. Florida (1940). Brown v. Mississippi (1936). Those ignorant of history -- are doomed to repeat it.
For our childrens', and grandchildrens' sake -- let us keep repeating that inexorable truth. It is almost more important than the fact that both our founding documents, and our moral conscience, suggest that torture is wrong. If there is nearly naught -- in the way of reliable intel from torture -- the motivation to employ it will dissipate. In any event, here is the NYT version -- do go read it all:
. . . .The Senate report, totaling more than 6,000 pages, was completed last December but has yet to be declassified. According to people who have read the study, it is unsparing in its criticism of the now-defunct interrogation program and presents a chronicle of C.I.A. officials’ repeatedly misleading the White House, Congress and the public about the value of brutal methods that, in the end, produced little valuable intelligence.
Senator Mark Udall, Democrat of Colorado, disclosed the existence of the internal C.I.A. report during an Intelligence Committee hearing on Tuesday. He said he believed it was begun several years ago and “is consistent with the Intelligence’s Committee’s report” although it “conflicts with the official C.I.A. response to the committee’s report.”
“If this is true,” Mr. Udall said during a hearing on the nomination of Caroline D. Krass to be the C.I.A.’s top lawyer, “this raises fundamental questions about why a review the C.I.A. conducted internally years ago — and never provided to the committee — is so different from the C.I.A.’s formal response to the committee study. . . .”
gonzales fails to comply with house
subpoena/senate investigation. . .
