tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2322271369444984672.post6961340576241574305..comments2023-11-05T02:28:57.754-06:00Comments on indict dick cheney: the government's first UNSEALED answer to nacchio's claims -- october 22, 2007Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2322271369444984672.post-87697827697735003512007-10-24T13:40:00.000-05:002007-10-24T13:40:00.000-05:00welcome, wildcat70 --i agree with your observation...welcome, wildcat70 --<BR/><BR/>i agree with your observation <BR/>about the government's bag full<BR/>of tricks, here. i do need to<BR/>point out, though, that mr.<BR/>nacchio continued to SELL his<BR/>stock -- and in amounts larger<BR/>than those contemplated by his<BR/>filed 10b-5(1) trading plan,<BR/>long after it became clear<BR/>that -- FOR WHATEVER REASON -- his<BR/>firm would not get the condorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11014613306197942748noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2322271369444984672.post-37014601681996766302007-10-24T09:38:00.000-05:002007-10-24T09:38:00.000-05:00This does not in any way undercut Mr. Nacchio's de...This does not in any way undercut Mr. Nacchio's defense.<BR/> <BR/>The Government is controlling the flow of information.<BR/><BR/>They let out what is favorable to them.<BR/><BR/>If he had no defense why did they go to such great lengths to keep it out of the trial?<BR/><BR/>Why are these transcripts so heavily redacted?<BR/><BR/>What other contracts were there that Qwest did not get?<BR/><BR/>Wildcat70https://www.blogger.com/profile/00416534513158718001noreply@blogger.com